Thursday, 22Oct 2026
Software Rollout Training: How to Design eLearning That Gets Employees Productive on a New System from Day One
A new core banking platform, an ERP…
Monday, 12Oct 2026
Ask most L&D leaders how they handle a growing training backlog, and the answer is usually the same: work harder, hire more, or stretch deadlines. Rarely does anyone ask the more useful question: which of our tasks shouldn’t be on our plate in the first place?
Your best instructional designers and learning strategists are your scarcest resource. If they spend their weeks resizing screenshots, republishing files and chasing formatting issues, the business loses the thinking only they can do.
This blog explains how to find those low-value tasks, sort them with a simple traffic-light method, and decide what to keep, share or hand off.
Demand for training rarely shrinks. New products, policy changes, compliance cycles and role changes keep adding to the queue. Meanwhile, the team stays the same size.
When that happens, quality of thinking is the first thing to suffer. Teams default to quick fixes, skip analysis, and say yes to every request because there’s no time to ask whether training is even the right answer.
The fix isn’t always more headcount. It’s a clearer picture of where time actually goes.
You can’t redirect effort you haven’t measured. For two weeks, ask each team member to log their work in broad categories:
Don’t aim for perfect precision. A rough percentage per category is enough to show patterns, and the patterns are often surprising. Many teams find that development, updates and publishing quietly take up more than half of their week.
Once you have your list, rate each task on two simple questions:
| Colour | What it means | Typical action |
| Green | High business context, low repeatability | Keep with your core team |
| Amber | Needs your direction, but execution is fairly standard | Share: your team sets the brief, others help build |
| Red | Low context, highly repeatable, or varies a lot in volume | Strong candidate to hand off |
The goal isn’t to push everything to red. It’s to be honest about which tasks genuinely need your people and which only feel urgent because they’re always there.
These tasks are repeatable and follow clear standards, so they are good candidates to hand off to an external partner while your team keeps control of strategy and approvals.
Changing a logo, replacing an outdated screen, or fixing a policy reference takes time but little creativity. Your team decides what needs to change, and someone else can handle making the change.
Compliance refreshers, product knowledge modules and standard onboarding often follow the same layout and interaction patterns. Once the design approach is agreed, the production can be scaled without involving your senior designers in every build.
Turning slide decks, trainer guides or PDFs into online modules is common backlog work. Your team should decide what’s worth converting and what needs a rethink; the conversion itself can often be delivered by a production partner.
Each additional language means translation, review, text-fitting, audio, testing and later updates. The more languages you support, the more of your calendar this absorbs.
Scripting is a strategic task. Recording, editing, captioning and re-exporting after small edits is production work that rarely needs to sit with a learning strategist.
Checking that links, buttons, audio and tracking work properly is essential, but it follows a checklist. Reserve your experts for the question that needs them: will this actually help people perform better?
Product launches, audits and system rollouts create bursts of work that fade afterwards. Hiring permanently for a temporary peak rarely makes sense.
Some work gets stronger the closer it stays to your organization. Think twice before handing off:
A simple rule: repeatable work can move; judgment stays home.
AI tools can speed up first drafts, summaries, quiz questions and translation support. That’s useful, but it doesn’t remove the need for people to check accuracy, tone and relevance. It also doesn’t free up your team automatically. Someone still has to prompt, review and correct the output.
Treat AI as another way to speed up execution, and keep final decisions and approval with people who understand your business.
Imagine a team rolling out a new customer-service platform across several regions. Their audit shows designers spending most of their time building screens and updating files, while stakeholder planning gets squeezed into late evenings.
After sorting tasks, they keep needs analysis, learning design decisions and success measures in-house. They hand off module production, testing and language versions to an external team working to their templates and standards. The result: faster delivery, and designers who finally have time to speak with the managers who will reinforce the training.
Does this mean our team should stop building courses?
Not at all. It means building the right courses in-house, such as strategic or sensitive ones, and not spending expert time on every routine task.
How do we maintain quality when others do part of the work?
Share clear templates, style guides and review checkpoints, and keep final approval with your team.
What’s the easiest task to hand off first?
Routine updates, testing and multilingual versions are usually the simplest to define and measure.
Will this save money?
Often, but the larger gain is usually time. Freed-up experts can focus on work that directly improves performance.
How often should we revisit the audit?
Every six months, or after any major change in workload, team size or business priorities.
An effective L&D team isn’t measured by how much it builds with its own hands. It’s measured by how well it solves performance problems for the business. Protect the thinking, share the standard work, and hand off what doesn’t need your people’s expertise.
At Learning Owl, we work alongside L&D teams to take on production, updates and scaling needs, so your experts can stay focused on strategy.
Want to free up your team’s time? Talk to Learning Owl about a small pilot project and see the difference for yourself.
Thursday, 22Oct 2026
A new core banking platform, an ERP upgrade, a fresh CRM for the sales team or a new claims system for an insurer: every organisation goes through system changes, and…
Read More line_end_arrow_notch
Monday, 19Oct 2026
Almost every employee has done it. You open the annual compliance course, click "Next" until the quiz appears, guess your way to a pass mark, and close the window. Box…
Read More line_end_arrow_notch
Thursday, 15Oct 2026
Engaging Technical Training Starts with a Simple Shift Engaging technical training begins when employees stop seeing training as information they have to complete and start seeing it as knowledge they…
Read More line_end_arrow_notch